Channel 10 News reported Hilliard city council is split on the ballot issue which would change their charter to a city manager. Those opposed say it would eliminate checks and balances, and give too much power to a few.

Hilliard voters will decide on the Nov. 6 general-election ballot whether they want to switch their form of government to a city manager who is appointed by Hilliard City Council or continue with an elected mayor.

Supporters of the switch via charter amendment say it would help the city’s government run more efficiently. It also would align Hilliard with its suburban neighbors, many of which have adopted a city-manager approach to leadership.

Those who oppose Issue 33, including City Council President Albert Iosue, say eliminating an elected mayor would undercut the system of checks and balances – isolating too much power in one branch.

In a council-city manager model, a council sets a direction for the city – through legislation and a budget – and the city manager is tasked with the day-to-day execution, Councilman Pete Marsh said.

That model also would eliminate having a mayor with veto powers who might have ideas that compete with the council, he said.